Need help with ukf?

Click the “chat” button below for chat support from the developer who created it, or find similar developers for support.

229 Stars 120 Forks MIT License 282 Commits 5 Opened issues

Unscented Kalman Filter library for state and parameter estimation

Readme

Unscented Kalman filter library. Several different UKF implementations are provided:

- Standard Unscented Kalman Filter for state estimation, as originally described in [1], with extensions for quaternions as described in [2].
- Square-root Unscented Kalman Filter for state estimation, implemented as described in [3].
- Optimised form of square-root Unscented Kalman filter for parameter estimation, implemented as described in [3].

This library makes use of the Eigen library for linear algebra routines and matrix and vector operations. Heavy use is made of C++11 and C++14 features in an attempt to avoid any dynamic memory allocations and maximise opportunities for compile-time optimisations.

A primary goal of the library is to provide efficient UKF implementations for use on embedded systems, so there is a strong focus on having minimal dependencies and avoiding non-deterministic operations.

The filter can be compiled using either single or double precision by choosing one of the following preprocessor definitions:

- UKF
*SINGLE*PRECISION - UKF
*DOUBLE*PRECISION

The library contains a number of class templates which are to be specialised for the particular application. There are three main classes which need to be specialised to make up an implementation:

- State vector
- Measurement vector
- Core

The following examples are all derived from the unit tests, so have a look at them for more detail.

The state vector and measurement vector are made up of a number of fields, each of which contains a key and a type. The reason for this is to allow the filter to handle quaternions in the state vector transparently, so something like the following is allowed:

enum MyFields { LatLon, Altitude, Velocity, Attitude };using MyStateVector = UKF::StateVector< UKF::Field>, UKF::Field, UKF::Field>, UKF::Field >;

Internally, these fields are all stored together as one contiguous Eigen column vector, and all key lookups are done at compile time.

UKF scaling parameters can be adjusted in the following way:

template <> constexpr real_t UKF::Parameters::AlphaSquared = 1e-6;

For a description of what the scaling parameters do, see [2] or read the comments in the code.

The measurement vector can be specialised in a similar way, but with the choice of a fixed or dynamic measurement vector:

enum MyFields { StaticPressure, DynamicPressure, Accelerometer, Gyroscope };using MyMeasurementVector = UKF::FixedMeasurementVector< UKF::Field>, UKF::Field>, UKF::Field, UKF::Field >;

or:

enum MyFields { StaticPressure, DynamicPressure, Accelerometer, Gyroscope };using MyMeasurementVector = UKF::DynamicMeasurementVector< UKF::Field>, UKF::Field>, UKF::Field, UKF::Field >;

For the fixed measurement vector, all measurements have to be provided every filter iteration. The dynamic measurement vector allows for a filter where some measurements are not available at every iteration, and so should only be fused when they are available.

There is a small performance overhead for the dynamic measurement vector, but it does not do any dynamic memory allocation.

The Core class contains the filter state and step function. It can be specialised as follows:

using MyCore = UKF::Core< MyStateVector, MyMeasurementVector, UKF::IntegratorRK4 >;

Here, the user-specialised state vector and measurement vector classes are provided as template parameters, along with the integrator to use for the process model. For a list of available integrators, see Integrator.h.

The square-root state estimation filter can be used instead like this:

using MyCore = UKF::SquareRootCore< MyStateVector, MyMeasurementVector, UKF::IntegratorRK4 >;

Specialisations of the process model (for state estimation filters) and measurement model must also be provided.

The process model is implemented as an ODE, with a user-provided function to calculate the derivative. The ODE is then solved using the integrator method specified in the Core class specialisation.

Here is an example of a process model for a simple state vector:

using ProcessModelTestStateVector = UKF::StateVector< UKF::Field>, UKF::Field> >;template <> template <> ProcessModelTestStateVector ProcessModelTestStateVector::derivative<>() const { ProcessModelTestStateVector temp; /* Position derivative. */ temp.set_field(get_field());

`/* Velocity derivative. */ temp.set_field<velocity>(UKF::Vector<3>(0, 0, 0)); return temp;`

}

Also, the process model can take an arbitrary number of user-specified inputs, like this:

template <> template <> ProcessModelTestStateVector ProcessModelTestStateVector::derivative<:vector>>( const UKF::Vector<3>& acceleration) const { ProcessModelTestStateVector temp; /* Position derivative. */ temp.set_field(get_field());`/* Velocity derivative. */ temp.set_field<velocity>(acceleration); return temp;`

} </:vector>

The measurement model is specified per field, in order to allow the expected measurement vector to be constructed for the dynamic measurement vector where not all measurements may be available each iteration. Each measurement model function takes a state vector as an input.

The state vector type is provided to the measurement model specialisation as a template parameter; this allows a measurement vector class to be shared across multiple state vectors, with difference process model defined for each.

Here is an example of a measurement model for a simple measurement vector and state vector:

using MyMeasurementVector = UKF::DynamicMeasurementVector< UKF::Field, UKF::Field, UKF::Field>, UKF::Field> >;using MyStateVector = UKF::StateVector< UKF::Field>, UKF::Field>, UKF::Field, UKF::Field >;

template <> template <> UKF::Vector<3> MyMeasurementVector::expected_measurement (const MyStateVector& state) { return state.get_field() * UKF::Vector<3>(0, 0, -9.8); }

template <> template <> UKF::Vector<3> MyMeasurementVector::expected_measurement (const MyStateVector& state) { return state.get_field(); }

template <> template <> real_t MyMeasurementVector::expected_measurement (const MyStateVector& state) { return 101.3 - 1.2*(state.get_field() / 100.0); }

template <> template <> real_t MyMeasurementVector::expected_measurement (const MyStateVector& state) { return 0.5 * 1.225 * state.get_field().squaredNorm(); }

As with the process model, the measurement model can take an arbitrary number of user-specified inputs:

template <> template <> UKF::Vector<3> MyMeasurementVector::expected_measurement >(const MyStateVector& state, const UKF::Vector<3>& input) { return state.get_field() * UKF::Vector<3>(0, 0, -9.8) + input; }template <> template <> UKF::Vector<3> MyMeasurementVector::expected_measurement >(const MyStateVector& state, const UKF::Vector<3>& input) { return state.get_field(); }

template <> template <> real_t MyMeasurementVector::expected_measurement >(const MyStateVector& state, const UKF::Vector<3>& input) { return 101.3 - 1.2*(state.get_field() / 100.0); }

template <> template <> real_t MyMeasurementVector::expected_measurement >(const MyStateVector& state, const UKF::Vector<3>& input) { return 0.5 * 1.225 * state.get_field().squaredNorm(); }

The filter state, covariance, process noise covariance and measurement noise covariance should be initialised to appropriate values, e.g.:

MyCore test_filter; test_filter.state.set_field(UKF::Vector<3>(0, 0, 0)); test_filter.state.set_field(UKF::Vector<3>(0, 0, 0)); test_filter.state.set_field(UKF::Quaternion(1, 0, 0, 0)); test_filter.state.set_field(UKF::Vector<3>(0, 0, 0)); test_filter.covariance = MyStateVector::CovarianceMatrix::Zero(); test_filter.covariance.diagonal() << 10000, 10000, 10000, 100, 100, 100, 1, 1, 5, 10, 10, 10; test_filter.process_noise_covariance = MyStateVector::CovarianceMatrix::Identity()*1e-5; test_filter.measurement_covariance << 10, 10, 10, 1, 1, 1, 5e-1, 5e-1, 5e-1, 5e-1, 5e-1, 5e-1, 0.05, 0.05, 0.05;

Or, for the SR-UKF:

C++ MyCore test_filter; test_filter.state.set_field(UKF::Vector<3>(0, 0, 0)); test_filter.state.set_field(UKF::Vector<3>(0, 0, 0)); test_filter.state.set_field(UKF::Quaternion(1, 0, 0, 0)); test_filter.state.set_field(UKF::Vector<3>(0, 0, 0)); test_filter.root_covariance = MyStateVector::CovarianceMatrix::Zero(); test_filter.root_covariance.diagonal() << 100, 100, 100, 10, 10, 10, 1, 1, 2.2, 3.2, 3.2, 3.2; test_filter.process_noise_root_covariance = MyStateVector::CovarianceMatrix::Identity()*3e-2; test_filter.measurement_root_covariance << 10, 10, 10, 1, 1, 1, 5e-1, 5e-1, 5e-1, 5e-1, 5e-1, 5e-1, 0.05, 0.05, 0.05; test_filter.measurement_root_covariance = test_filter.measurement_root_covariance.array().sqrt();

Currently, only a diagonal measurement noise covariance matrix is supported.

The general steps for carrying out a filter iteration are something like:

MyMeasurementVector meas; meas.set_field(UKF::Vector<3>(0.0, 0.0, 9.8)); meas.set_field(UKF::Vector<3>(0.0, 0.0, 0.0)); meas.set_field(101300.0); meas.set_field(101300.0);test_filter.step(0.01, meas);

Or, if it's necessary to do things with the internal filter state (e.g. filter health monitoring), then iteration can be split up into three steps:

MyMeasurementVector meas; meas.set_field(UKF::Vector<3>(0.0, 0.0, 9.8)); meas.set_field(UKF::Vector<3>(0.0, 0.0, 0.0)); meas.set_field(101300.0); meas.set_field(101300.0);test_filter.a_priori_step(0.01); /* At this point, the state and covariance (or root_covariance) variables reflect the a priori state and (root_)covariance.

/ test_filter.innovation_step(meas); /Innovation and innovation_(root_)covariance variables are now set./ test_filter.a_posteriori_step(); /State and (root_)covariance variables are set to the a priori values.

Some examples are provided here.

[1] "A New Extension of the Kalman Filter to Nonlinear Systems:,
S. J. Julier and J. K. Uhlmann,
https://www.cs.unc.edu/~welch/kalman/media/pdf/Julier1997*SPIE*KF.pdf

[2] "Unscented Filtering for Spacecraft Attitude Estimation", John L. Crassidis and F. Landis Markley, http://www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~johnc/uf_att.pdf

[3] "The Square-Root Unscented Kalman Filter for State and Parameter-Estimation", Rudolph van der Merwe and Eric A. Wan, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.80.1421&rep=rep1&type=pdf