Need help with tfcausalimpact?
Click the “chat” button below for chat support from the developer who created it, or find similar developers for support.

About the developer

207 Stars 30 Forks Apache License 2.0 28 Commits 12 Opened issues


Python Causal Impact Implementation Based on Google's R Package. Built using TensorFlow Probability.

Services available


Need anything else?

Contributors list

# 149,532
26 commits
# 220,274
1 commit
# 222,830
1 commit


Build Status Coverage Status GitHub license PyPI version Pyversions

Google's Causal Impact Algorithm Implemented on Top of TensorFlow Probability.

How It Works

The algorithm basically fits a Bayesian structural model on past observed data to make predictions on what future data would look like. Past data comprises everything that happened before an intervention (which usually is the changing of a variable as being present or not, such as a marketing campaign that starts to run at a given point). It then compares the counter-factual (predicted) series against what was really observed in order to extract statistical conclusions.

Running the model is quite straightforward, it requires the observed data

, covariates
that helps the model through a linear regression, a
interval that selects everything that happened before the intervention and a
with data after the "impact" happened.

Please refer to this medium post for more on this subject.


pip install tfcausalimpact


  • python{3.6, 3.7, 3.8}
  • matplotlib
  • jinja2
  • tensorflow>=2.3.0
  • tensorflow_probability>=0.11.0

Getting Started

We recommend this presentation by Kay Brodersen (one of the creators of the Causal Impact in R).

We also created this introductory ipython notebook with examples of how to use this package.

This medium article also offers some ideas and concepts behind the library.


Here's a simple example (which can also be found in the original Google's R implementation) running in Python:

import pandas as pd
from causalimpact import CausalImpact

data = pd.read_csv('')[['y', 'X']] data.iloc[70:, 0] += 5

pre_period = [0, 69] post_period = [70, 99]

ci = CausalImpact(data, pre_period, post_period) print(ci.summary()) print(ci.summary(output='report')) ci.plot()

Summary should look like this:

Posterior Inference {Causal Impact}
                          Average            Cumulative
Actual                    125.23             3756.86
Prediction (s.d.)         120.34 (0.31)      3610.28 (9.28)
95% CI                    [119.76, 120.97]   [3592.67, 3629.06]

Absolute effect (s.d.) 4.89 (0.31) 146.58 (9.28) 95% CI [4.26, 5.47] [127.8, 164.19]

Relative effect (s.d.) 4.06% (0.26%) 4.06% (0.26%) 95% CI [3.54%, 4.55%] [3.54%, 4.55%]

Posterior tail-area probability p: 0.0 Posterior prob. of a causal effect: 100.0%

For more details run the command: print(impact.summary('report'))

And here's the plot graphic:

alt text

Google R Package vs TensorFlow Python

Both packages should give equivalent results. Here's an example using the

dataset available in the
folder. When running CausalImpact in the original R package, this is the result:


data = read.csv.zoo('comparison_data.csv', header=TRUE)

Summary results:

Posterior inference {CausalImpact}

                     Average          Cumulative        

Actual 78574 1414340
Prediction (s.d.) 79232 (736) 1426171 (13253)
95% CI [77743, 80651] [1399368, 1451711]

Absolute effect (s.d.) -657 (736) -11831 (13253)
95% CI [-2076, 832] [-37371, 14971]

Relative effect (s.d.) -0.83% (0.93%) -0.83% (0.93%)
95% CI [-2.6%, 1%] [-2.6%, 1%]

Posterior tail-area probability p: 0.20061 Posterior prob. of a causal effect: 80%

For more details, type: summary(impact, "report")

And correspondent plot:

alt text


import pandas as pd
from causalimpact import CausalImpact

data = pd.read_csv('', index_col=['DATE']) pre_period = ['2019-04-16', '2019-07-14'] post_period = ['2019-7-15', '2019-08-01'] ci = CausalImpact(data, pre_period, post_period, model_args={'fit_method': 'hmc'})

Summary is:

Posterior Inference {Causal Impact}
                          Average            Cumulative
Actual                    78574.42           1414339.5
Prediction (s.d.)         79282.92 (727.48)  1427092.62 (13094.72)
95% CI                    [77849.5, 80701.18][1401290.94, 1452621.31]

Absolute effect (s.d.) -708.51 (727.48) -12753.12 (13094.72) 95% CI [-2126.77, 724.92] [-38281.81, 13048.56]

Relative effect (s.d.) -0.89% (0.92%) -0.89% (0.92%) 95% CI [-2.68%, 0.91%] [-2.68%, 0.91%]

Posterior tail-area probability p: 0.16 Posterior prob. of a causal effect: 84.12%

For more details run the command: print(impact.summary('report'))

And plot:

alt text

Both results are equivalent.


This package uses as default the

Variational Inference
method from

TensorFlow Probability
which is faster and should work for the most part. Convergence can take somewhere between 2~3 minutes on more complex time series. You could also try running the package on top of GPUs to see if results improve.

If, on the other hand, precision is the top requirement when running causal impact analyzes, it's possible to switch algorithms by manipulating the input arguments like so:

ci = CausalImpact(data, pre_period, post_period, model_args={'fit_method': 'hmc'})

This will make usage of the algorithm

Hamiltonian Monte Carlo
which is State-of-the-Art for finding the Bayesian posterior of distributions. Still, keep in mind that on complex time series with thousands of data points and complex modeling involving various seasonal components this optimization can take 1 hour or even more to complete (on a GPU). Performance is sacrificed in exchange for better precision.

Bugs & Issues

If you find bugs or have any issues while running this library please consider opening an

with a complete description and reproductible environment so we can better help you solving the problem.

We use cookies. If you continue to browse the site, you agree to the use of cookies. For more information on our use of cookies please see our Privacy Policy.